🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies represent an grave risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Problem

The growing disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the US, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The scene of world technology leadership is decidedly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap prompts a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several key reasons account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and agile network for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a true capital markets union, which limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is split among 27 separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, one can find causes for hope. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for major changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent still possesses considerable strengths: high-quality human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier labs. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically boost economic output by implementing and tailoring innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. But, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.